Robinhood’s Chief Authorized Officer Daniel Gallagher criticized the US Securities and Trade Fee’s (SEC) method to crypto regulation in written testimony submitted for a Sept. 18 listening to earlier than the Home Monetary Companies Subcommittee on Digital Belongings.
Gallagher detailed Robinhood’s efforts to adjust to SEC rules, citing over a dozen conferences and calls over 18 months. Nevertheless, regardless of these efforts, the corporate acquired a Wells discover from the SEC’s Enforcement Division in Might.
He identified that the SEC employees had been usually unresponsive to Robinhood’s requests for steerage on transferring ahead with its registration proposal.
‘Scorched earth method’
Gallagher labeled the SEC’s technique a “scorched earth” method that negatively impacts US crypto buyers.
He argued that the shortage of clear steerage on which digital asset transactions qualify as funding contracts stays a basic problem. This uncertainty has led to a number of lawsuits by the SEC towards crypto companies, additional hampering trade progress.
Gallagher added that “regulation by enforcement” harms American shoppers in search of higher entry to digital property. It additionally stifles innovation in blockchain and erodes the US’s aggressive edge in world digital asset markets.
He contrasted the US with Europe, the place the Markets in Crypto-Belongings (MiCA) regulation offers a unified framework for crypto markets, enabling innovation to flourish abroad.
Subsequent steps for SEC
Gallagher steered that the SEC may use its present authority below Part 36 of the Securities Trade Act of 1934 to create a framework for registering and overseeing platforms that facilitate buying and selling in digital property deemed funding contracts.
He famous this rulemaking may deal with key points similar to registration, shopper protections, custody necessities, and transaction reporting. These measures, he added, may have mitigated a number of the harm brought on by the FTX collapse in 2022.
Congress roles
Gallagher emphasised the necessity for Congress to ascertain a transparent, complete regulatory framework for digital property.
He argued that solely Congress can present the long-term regulatory readability wanted to make sure token issuers, exchanges, and different market individuals can function with out worry of fixed enforcement actions.
Such readability, based on Gallagher, is essential for sustaining the US’s management in accountable blockchain innovation and well-regulated digital asset markets.