On Friday, the Uniswap Basis introduced it was suspending a key vote on whether or not the protocol’s governance construction and compensation mechanism must be upgraded to raised reward holders of the UNI governance token. The nonprofit cited considerations from a “individual of curiosity,” believed to be an fairness investor within the group behind the biggest Ethereum-based decentralized change.
Word: The views expressed on this column are these of the writer and don’t essentially mirror these of CoinDesk, Inc. or its house owners and associates.That is an excerpt from The Node publication, a every day digest of probably the most essential crypto information on CoinDesk and past. You possibly can subscribe to get the complete publication right here.
“Over the previous week, an celebration has raised a brand new concern relating to this work that requires extra diligence on our half to completely examine. Because of the immutable nature and sensitivity of our proposed improve, we have now made the tough resolution to to postpone posting this vote,” the inspiration wrote on X (previously Twitter).
Whereas the inspiration stated the choice was “sudden” and apologized for the state of affairs, that is removed from the primary delay in a vote on whether or not to allow the “payment swap” that might ship a modest quantity of protocol buying and selling charges to token holders . Additionally it is removed from the one time that the pursuits of token holders have seemingly conflicted with these of different ‘stakeholders’ in Uniswap.
“We’ll maintain the group knowledgeable of any materials adjustments and can replace you all as soon as we have now extra certainty about future time frames,” the inspiration added.
Uniswap issued the UNI token within the wake of “DeFi Summer time” in 2020 to stave off a so-called “vampire assault” from Sushiswap, which launched with the governance token SUSHI and shortly started attracting liquidity. Sushiswap was seen as comparatively extra community-oriented because it was managed by a DAO and despatched buying and selling charges to token holders.
Model 2 of Uniswap included code that splits the 0.3% of buying and selling charges paid to liquidity suppliers (or those that contribute tokens to be traded on the decentralized change), with 0.25% going to LPs and the remaining 0.05 % to UNI token holders. However the ‘payment swap’ was by no means activated.
With the launch of Uniswap V3, discussions arose once more concerning the activation of the payment swap. GFX Labs, maker of the Oku, a front-end interface for Uniswap, proposed a plan that might check protocol payment distribution on a number of swimming pools on Uniswap V2 that have been getting a whole lot of consideration. However the talks finally fell via, partly on account of considerations that activation may drive LPs and liquidity off the platform, and on account of authorized fears.
Additionally see: Hayden Adams of Uniswap: from Ethereum idealist to enterprise realist
One of many largest considerations on the time was that the speed change may have tax and securities legislation implications for UniDAO, as UniDAO would primarily be paying out some type of income-based dividend to token holders.
It’s unclear precisely what considerations Uniswap Basis was responding to when it determined to postpone the vote once more. Gabriel Shapiro, a number one crypto authorized skilled, wrote that that is one more instance of a DeFi protocol that treats token holders as “second-class” residents whose needs are subordinate to a smaller group of stakeholders.
Comparable arguments have been made late final 12 months when Uniswap Labs imposed a 0.15% buying and selling payment on its frontend web site and pockets – the primary time the event group sought to monetize its work straight. The payment solely utilized to merchandise serviced by Uniswap Labs, not the change protocol itself, however did come after a $165 million improve.
There isn’t a purpose to be utterly cynical right here and counsel that the hardcoded fee change to reward UNI token holders won’t ever be carried out. Uniswap Labs and UNI token holders are separate entities with their very own pursuits; Ideally, each could be aligned to do what’s greatest for the protocol itself
But when there is a lesson to be realized inside DeFi, it is that token holders do not all the time get the ultimate say.